Sunday, Aug 3:
The Hennepin-Lake Classic 10k is always a hot race, held in the first week of August. I almost dread it because of that, but it’s mostly flat and can be a PR course for some. For a year or two it was my PR course. Today’s race was 72 degrees, overcast, and breezy, about as comfortable as any Classic I’ve run. I ran slowly, but probably could have run a little faster because I was able to speed up in the last mile. Finished 4th of 9 in my age group though, good enough for now. Maybe someday I’ll get some speed back.
Splits: 8:52, 9:04, 8:56, 8:33, 9:06, 8:15, 1:33 (0.2 mi), finish time 54:18, pace 8:45. No pains of any kind. It’s a masterpiece!
Saturday, Aug 2:
I wanted to run easy today, and short, and so did George. While the real studs of the St Croix Valley Runners were finishing their five miles in 37+ minutes, we two loped along and did 3.4 miles in about 34 minutes for a pace of 10 minutes per mile. We actually ran four minutes and then walked one, repeating, so I’m a little surprised that we even went that fast. This morning’s temperature was cooler than it has been lately, in the high sixties, a welcome respite. Humid though - the fast runners were literally steaming when they finished. Slight soreness in my right hip - I don’t recognize it as anything I’ve felt before, and suspect it’s from sleeping badly on that hip. It’ll go away. The new Brooks Ghost shoes felt just fine.
Friday, Aug 1:
About six miles in the relative cool of the morning, running in the park with my two sweeties. We agreed to meet back in an hour, and I took the paved trails this time because, though I like running on grass, the grass trails were very wet with dew. 5.7 miles in 55:48, pace 9:47. I did walk up several hills to spare the hip flexors, at least that’s my excuse. No pains of any kind.
Sunday, August 03, 2008
Hennepin-Lake Classic 10k
Posted by
Don
at
9:09 PM
1 comments
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Brooks Ghost Shoe Review
In six years of running I’ve gone through eighteen pairs of Brooks Burn running shoes, using them both for training and for racing all distances up to and including 29 marathons. The Burn was marketed as a lightweight, neutral trainer for the biomechanically efficient runner who needs cushioning but little more. Then Brooks stopped making them. The brand new Ghost appears to be marketed to the same neutral, biomechanically efficient runners, but that information comes only from the web sites that are selling the shoe.
I can’t find the Ghost on Brooks’ own web site - why on earth wouldn’t Brooks want to give a new product a good kickoff with solid information about it on their own site? That’s very lame. 
I bought my new Brooks Ghost shoes from RnJ Sports, where I’ve bought most of my pairs of Burn, Burn 2, and Burn 3 shoes. They are just getting stocked up on the Ghost - I had to phone them to order. Their price is good, and shipment is immediate and free. Their return policy is draconian, however: "All returned merchandise must be 100% new and unused," plus there are restocking fees. They really seem to want you to buy your first pair from someone else with a better return policy. I did check the fit on these carefully before running anywhere in them.
Brooks Ghost Shoe Review
I’ve run in the new Ghost twice now, 6.6 miles on pavement and about 14 miles on a mix of pavement, gravel, sand, and grass. The shoes performed well in both runs. Specifics:
- Weight: I had read on a running magazine site that the Ghost would be heavier than the Burn, but in my size, 11 ½, they weight exactly the same, 25 ounces for the pair.
- Size: I had also read that it might be necessary to order a half-size larger than the Burn size, but these seem to have the right amount of toe space.
- Fit: This is why I stick with Brooks - the Burns fit so well, with almost no blister problems, and there is nothing more important than fit. The fit of the Ghost seems as good as the fit of the Burn, so far.
- Shape:
- Toe Box: Recent incarnations of the Burn have had a narrowed toe box. The new Ghost appears to have a wider toe box, but I think that’s an optical effect created by the upper shoe trim, and the toe box is actually about the same as the Burn 3.
- Sole: The bottom of the Ghost is flatter than the bottom of the Burn, which curves more from the ball of the foot to the heel, and the Ghost lacks the "lateral arch pod." Because of this, the Ghost tends to "slap" a little more on the pavement when I run. I don’t like that but I can deal with it; maybe it will get better as the shoe wears.
- Toe: The toe curves up more than the Burn. No problem so far.
- Width: Both are D width and they feel about the same.
- Tread: Appears to be a little more aggressive than the Burn 3. Nevertheless, when I ran the Ghost on gravel roads and sandy trails the tread did not pick up many rocks. The Burn shoes would occasionally pick up a small pebble and drop it into the other shoe, which has not happened with the Ghost.
- Color: Blue and white, who cares?
- Cushioning: I don’t sense much difference between the Burn 3 and the Ghost. I’ve read that the Ghost is supposed to be more responsive (does that mean bouncy?), but it might take a more sophisticated runner to detect that. I still had to do the work. Maybe I’ll try Burn on one foot and Ghost on the other.
- Manufacture: Both are made in China.
Today’s run: About 14 miles on a mix of trails and roads, mostly in a lovely park not too far from home. Part of the run was with friend Cal - it’s nice to run and chat. I walked up some hills because the right hip flexors were sending signals. Part of the run was on wooded, grass trails - I liked that the best on such a warm and humid morning. I carried water and munched on Clif Shot Bloks.
Monday, July 28:
The idea today was to run six fairly flat miles in the new Brooks Ghost shoes, to try them out. No problems to speak of. 6.6 miles in 1:04:07, pace 9:43. Compared with my old Brooks Burns, the new shoes slap a little more on blacktop surfaces when I run, but that’s about the only significant difference. They’re the same weight and seem to have about the same cushioning. I’m not sophisticated enough to rate them on "ride" but I don’t notice a difference. Soon I’ll try them on a longer run.
Posted by
Don
at
1:27 PM
13
comments
Saturday, July 26, 2008
Lumberjack Days 10-Mile Race
The Lumberjack Days mostly-downhill 10-mile race is a great summer tradition and the 10-mile PR for many runners including me. It’s possible to have better weather for it than today, but in six years of running the race I haven’t seen better. It’s almost always hot and usually humid. Today was 70 degrees, sunny, low dew point, with very little wind.
I ran without a lot of motivation today, mostly trying not to get hurt, and finished in 1:32:00 for a pace of 9:06, almost five minutes over my worst previous Lumberjack time, and fifteen minutes over my 2006 time which is also my 10-mile PR. Nevertheless, I was third of seven in my 65-69 age group, not so bad. I know that I could have run at least a little faster, because I was able to speed up a bit in the last mile and finish with a sprint and energy left over. Breathing was four footfalls per full breath most of the way, speeding up to three footfalls much of the time after mile seven and especially in the last mile. Three is a race pace, while four is a training pace or marathon race pace.
Splits: 9:08, 17:28 (2 mi), 28:53 (3 mi), 8:20, 9:08, 9:50, 8:12, total 1:31:00, average pace 9:06. Nice run. My sweeties ran the 5k and did their best ever for that race, so we all had a great time at Lumberjack Days once again.
Tonight's dinner, from the bottom: Organic blue-corn chips, curried lamb, mixed organic vegetables, organic sweet potatoes, onions, organic strawberries.
Posted by
Don
at
8:49 PM
1 comments
Friday, July 25, 2008
Rice Street Mile
This is Americana at its best. The one-mile race kicks off the parade, and people of the neighborhood line Rice Street in St Paul with their lawn chairs and blankets, munching on snacks, with the delightful smells of charcoal cooking in the air.
Off we went at the gun, barrelling down the middle of the street as fast as we could for a mile, my own personal goal to NOT finish LAST. I made it in 6:43, finishing 72nd of 76 males, with the last guy more than a minute behind me. Whew. I'd have done better in the women's race! To be fair to me, though, a lot of fast young guys ran the race; the winner finished in 4:13, and 26 men finished under 5:00.
No pains or strains, except I breathed so hard that it irritated my throat, and I coughed a lot and tasted a little blood.
I ran the 2006 Rice Street Mile in 5:54, so this was about 50 seconds slower. In January of this year, before any myeloma treatment, I ran an indoor mile in 6:12, so this was about 30 seconds slower. I'm not unhappy with yesterday's time, though. It'll do for now. But I'm going to find ways to get some of my speed back, despite the dexamethasone. Just wait and see!
Posted by
Don
at
8:49 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Flat Four
Four miles this morning, flat course, nice hard road surfaces, 65 degrees with a decent dew point. Nice run. Time 35:39, pace 8:55. Breathing was mostly four footfalls per full breath, but sometimes as fast as three, especially toward the end of the run. A "tempo" pace for me these days, it appears. But any pace is better than no pace.
Yesterday I ordered a pair of Brooks Ghost shoes, a brand-new neutral training shoe model. I have burned up 17 pairs of Brooks Burns, and then of course they discontinued that model. The Ghost is not a direct replacement, it’s a couple of ounces heavier I hear, but it’s the next best Brooks model and I have found Brooks shoes to fit exceptionally well. So we’ll test a pair.
Dex lunch, meant to be healthful and relatively low carb: Organic chicken, vidalia onions, organic carrots, kiwi, plain water. I probably should have left out the kiwi, but I wanted the color for the picture :-)
Posted by
Don
at
8:47 PM
0
comments
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Building the Base
Sunday, July 20:
We got a half inch of rain last night (in about five minutes), and I decided to see what would happen to my favorite dirt road along the railroad tracks after a rain. Would it be muddy, or would the rain soak right through the soft sandy soil and leave a decent trail? For sure it wouldn’t be dusty, as it was last week. Answer: It was fine! Shoes did bring home a little wet sand, but that’s the worst of it. I met a train again, and the engineer saluted me with two toots. Love it. Do you suppose he’s actually trying to tell me to get the hell off railroad property? Naw. Anyway I don’t care. I wonder if it’s the same engineer who has saluted before.
Twelve miles, started at 6:00 am (after 5 ½ hours sleep), plenty of wildlife (mostly bunnies and birds), no problems. Slight pain in the left lisfranc joints, which were injured in a snowshoeing faceplant a few years ago, but this is not a problem. Nothing from the achilles tendon, knees, hips, plantar fascia, or muscles. Gosh that’s 33 miles in four days - I’m feeling like the myriad injuries are mostly behing me. Hope hope.
Splits: 9:17, 9:23, 9:22, 8:49, 9:39, 19:38 (2 miles), 9:06, 9:50, 8:35, 11:03, 9:29, total 1:54:10, pace 9:31. Not bad. Breathing was moderate, four footfalls per full breath almost all the way. It’s a masterpiece.
Saturday, July 19:
St Croix Valley Runners, five miles in 44:00, pace 8:48. Nice run with Doug and the rest of the runners, beautiful morning, 73 degrees with a decent dew point. This is good running.
Lunch: Beets, beet greens, zucchini squash, leeks, spring onions, ginger, tomatoes, coconut milk, turmeric, grape seed oil, brown rice. Most ingredients are organic. Topped with a sprinkle of parmesan cheese (not shown).
Posted by
Don
at
8:01 PM
1 comments
Friday, July 18, 2008
Twenty-Two Miles
In two runs.
Thursday, July 17, Sweet Sixteen:
Sixteen miles on my favorite road along the tracks. The bad: 74 degrees with a dew point of 69 (warm & humid), rocky dirt trail (soft, hence slow), little wind. The good: It’s my favorite trail despite its failings, it’s FLAT as can be, there are no cars (or people, for that matter), and this morning I saw deer, racoons, foxes, a young pheasant, and innumerable rabbits. As I ran in the pre-dawn semi-darkness the silhouette of a blue heron, or perhaps a great egret, floated by overhead. Such magnificent birds. And of course I was treated to the symphony of wakening birds of all kinds, most of which I can’t even identify by song. By all measures, this was a great run.
The plan was to run SLOW in conditions like this, and that part of the plan certainly succeeded. The hip flexors did not hurt, nor did anything else that I worry about. The lisfranc joints in the right foot bothered a little after mile 12; I probably twisted the foot a little on a rock or something. Water every 2 miles, caffeinated gel at 4 & 12, regular gel at 8. Splits: 10:03, 9:05, 9:07, 11:32, 10:10, 9:42, 10:09, 9:34, 9:52, 10:12, 10:54, 21:33 (2 mi), 10:19, 9:54, 10:10, total 2:42:15, pace 10:08. I’m happy, it's a masterpiece.
Tuesday, July 15, Two-Toot Salute:
A lovely, uneventful run on my favorite rocky dirt road along the railroad tracks. Six miles, 61 degrees, dew point 51. Cool summer running. My legs felt like lead for the first quarter mile (day after dex?) but pretty soon everything was normal. I had felt some pain in the right hip flexors when I got out of bed (!), but that pain didn’t show up at all during the run.
I met a train on the way back, the engineer giving me two short toots as I waved. Love that! Then it thundered past, spewing diesel exhaust, rattling and tooting off into the distance behind me.
Splits: 9:30, 9:11, 9:28, 9:28, 9:30, 8:56, total 56:02, pace 9:20. Good enough for a tricky dirt trail.
Posted by
Don
at
9:55 AM
0
comments







